On a sunny Friday morning, Justin Trudeau strolled along Toronto’s Danforth Avenue seeking votes.
He was there for a specific reason and not just to make sure this riding that was once represented by NDP Leader Jack Layton didn’t flip back from red to orange.
Trudeau was on the Danforth because he wanted to talk about gun control.
On the evening of July 22, 2018, gunman Faisal Hussain walked along this popular destination for locals and tourists alike, shooting indiscriminately at people who were simply out enjoying a night on the patio.
Hussain wasn’t a licensed gun owner — the gun he used to kill two people and injure 13 others was stolen.
Now, more than a year after that shooting, Trudeau wants to act by banning a rifle that has been legal for more than 50 years in Canada and is only known to have been used in one shooting in Toronto — the AR-15.
Trudeau invoked recent shootings in Mississauga and Calgary as he made his announcement to ban the AR-15, even though those shootings both involved organized crime or gangs.
In the Mississauga example, a 17 year-old innocent bystander was killed as rival gangs shot up a neighbourhood in what police believe was an argument over disrespect in a rap video.
In Calgary, police called it a “targeted shooting.”
So in both cases we are talking about people who were not shot by legal gun owners, never mind by a rifle like the AR-15, and yet Trudeau’s plan for gun violence is to target legal gun owners once again.
Trudeau proposes to buy back the roughly 250,000 AR-15 rifles in Canada, a move that would cost the federal government between $400 million and $600 million just for that one rifle, according to Liberal numbers.
Yet they also want to ban other rifles as well, rifles that are widely owned and are not a problem when it comes to crime.
So the true figure will be what? At least $1 billion or more for the Trudeau Liberals to buy back firearms that aren’t used in crime so that they can tell people worried about crime that they are doing something?
Is that a good investment of your money?
I get the arguments that we need to do what we can to reduce gun crime but let me ask the obvious question once again. How does making new laws that target law-abiding gun owners keep any of us safer?
- DANFORTH KILLER: Twisted trail that led to deadly rampage
- WARMINGTON: 136 bullets fired in shooting rampage that killed Jonathan Davis
- Hwy. 410 murder victim ID’d as cops hunt shooter, stolen getaway car
- Man, 25, gunned down as more bullets fly in Toronto
We all want out streets, our neighbourhoods to be safer. We all want to know that our kids can walk around the block without getting shot.
But if the shootings happening in Canada are being carried out by gangsters with handguns, how does banning certain rifles help?
Yes, the Trudeau Liberals say they will seek to make it so that cities and towns can ban handguns, but that only works if the provinces work with them and I don’t see that happening.
Even if it did, will people who are currently in violation of more than half a dozen laws as they fire bullets at will suddenly stop shooting because there is a new ban?
The answer is an obvious no.
To deal with crime, we need to deal with criminals and that is not something that Trudeau’s new proposal comes close to dealing with.